Negotiating Maternity Leave Expectations: Perceived Tensions between Ethics of Justice and Care
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-2004
Keywords
ethics, maternity leave, negotiation, gender communication, superior-subordinate communication
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943604268174
Abstract
Academic and popular materials designate maternity leave as a period of transition and role negotiation in which women and other organizational members, particularly their bosses, might interact differently from times in which there are no employment breaks. Because maternity leave is a socially constructed process within specific interactional contexts, women’s discourse can reveal ways they shape their expectations about treatment during pregnancies/leaves. Their discourse displays how they perceive, make sense of, and negotiate their experiences with others. In this study, women who had maternity leaves indicated that their treatment often differed so greatly fromexpectations that they were unable to communicate and negotiate with their bosses. Viewed from ethics of justice and care, these boss-subordinate exchanges were not simply instances of miscommunication but possibly tensions produced by conceptualizing and enacting justice and care stances. Feminist ethics provides a way to reframe ethical stances and construct visions of caring workplace communities.
Was this content written or created while at USF?
No
Citation / Publisher Attribution
International Journal of Business Communication, v. 41, issue 4, p. 323-349
Scholar Commons Citation
Liu, Meina and Buzzanell, Patrice M., "Negotiating Maternity Leave Expectations: Perceived Tensions between Ethics of Justice and Care" (2004). Communication Faculty Publications. 759.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/spe_facpub/759
