Syntactic Parsing Preferences and their On-Line Revisions: A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Event-Related Brain Potentials
Event-related potentialLanguage processingSyntactic ambiguitySpatio-temporal principal component analysisP600/SPS, P300ERP Sub-component
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
The present study investigates the processes involved in the recovery from temporarily ambiguous garden-path sentences. Event-related brain potentials (ERP) were recorded while subjects read German subject–object ambiguous relative and complement clauses. As both clause types are initially analyzed as subject-first structures, object-first structures require a revision which is more difficult for complement than for relative clauses. The hypothesis is tested that the revision process consists of two sub-processes, namely diagnosis and actual reanalysis. Applying a spatio-temporal principal component analysis to the ERP data, distinct positive sub-components presumably reflecting different sub-processes could be identified in the time range of the P300 and P600. It will be argued that the P600 is not a monolithic component, and that different subprocesses may be involved at varying time points depending on the type of garden-path sentence.
Was this content written or created while at USF?
Citation / Publisher Attribution
Cognitive Brain Research, v. 11, issue 2, p. 305-323
Scholar Commons Citation
Friederici, Angela D.; Mecklinger, Axel; Spencer, Kevin M.; Steinhauer, Karsten; and Donchin, Emanuel, "Syntactic Parsing Preferences and their On-Line Revisions: A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Event-Related Brain Potentials" (2001). Psychology Faculty Publications. 335.