Does Mentoring Matter? A Multidisciplinary Meta-Analysis Comparing Mentored and Non-Mentored Individuals
Mentoring relationships, Protégé outcomes, Protégé attitudes
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
The study of mentoring has generally been conducted within disciplinary silos with a specific type of mentoring relationship as a focus. The purpose of this article is to quantitatively review the three major areas of mentoring research (youth, academic, workplace) to determine the overall effect size associated with mentoring outcomes for protégés. We also explored whether the relationship between mentoring and protégé outcomes varied by the type of mentoring relationship (youth, academic, workplace). Results demonstrate that mentoring is associated with a wide range of favorable behavioral, attitudinal, health-related, relational, motivational, and career outcomes, although the effect size is generally small. Some differences were also found across type of mentoring. Generally, larger effect sizes were detected for academic and workplace mentoring compared to youth mentoring. Implications for future research, theory, and applied practice are provided.
Was this content written or created while at USF?
Citation / Publisher Attribution
Journal of Vocational Behavior, v. 72, issue 2, p. 254-267.
Scholar Commons Citation
Eby, Lillian T.; Allen, Tammy D.; Evans, Sarah C.; Ng, Thomas; and Dubois, David, "Does Mentoring Matter? A Multidisciplinary Meta-Analysis Comparing Mentored and Non-Mentored Individuals" (2008). Psychology Faculty Publications. 23.