Title

The Proof is in the Punch: Gender Differences in Perceptions of Action and Aggression as Components of Manhood

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2-2010

Keywords

Precarious manhood, Physical aggression, Gender roles, Human gender differences

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9713-6

Abstract

Two studies test the hypotheses that men, relative to women: 1) see manhood as a more elusive, impermanent state than womanhood, and 2) understand aggression as a means of proving or re-establishing threatened manhood, but not threatened womanhood. In Study 1 (N = 175 Northeastern U.S. undergraduates), men’s (but not women’s) sentence completions revealed tendencies to define manhood by actions and womanhood by enduring traits. In Study 2 (N = 113 Southeastern U.S. undergraduates), men were more likely than women to explain a man’s physical aggression in primarily situational terms, whereas men and women did not differ in the attributions they made for a woman’s physical aggression. Results suggest that men perceive active and aggressive behaviors as integral parts of manhood and its defense.

Was this content written or created while at USF?

Yes

Citation / Publisher Attribution

Sex Roles, v. 62, issues 3-4, p. 241-251

Share

COinS