Title

What can We Say about the Future of Social Science?

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-2013

Keywords

Expertise, Moynihan Report, neuroscience, policy science, social science

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499613496724

Abstract

Social science has for the most part lost its ambition to be ‘science’, as shown in the recent change in the American Anthropological Association statement of purpose. The new term is expertise. The change points to something fundamental: social science methods are now largely stable; they have well-developed uses for public and policy audiences; because they are user-friendly they are unlikely to radically change, and new problems arise for them to be applied to. New concepts are developed, but they do not develop into ‘theories’ in a scientific sense. So what is expertise? It is something other than fact generation: it is the result of aggregating and assessing research in an area. Experts engage with one another, so there is a community of expertise. Yet there is also another sense of ‘scientific’: using the tools of natural science and extending them to the social. The current means of doing this for social science is through neuroscience. These methods could serve to filter and validate social science concepts.

Was this content written or created while at USF?

Yes

Citation / Publisher Attribution

Anthropological Theory, v. 13, issue 3, p. 187-200

Share

COinS