Truth and ‘Truth’: The Social Construction of Truth and Memory in International Human Rights

Authors

Rachel A. May, Notre Dame Law SchoolFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-2003

Abstract

Transitional justice is a rich area of inquiry. The literature and the academic discourse surrounding the phenomenon of transitional justice are at the forefront of human rights scholarship. Much of this discourse focuses on questions of the functional choices: restorative or retributive justice. A “restorative” approach to justice focuses on the idea of reconciliation while the “retributive” approach focuses on the punishment of perpetrators. The idea of truth telling, which encompasses truth commissions and historical memory, is most closely connected to a restorative approach to justice, although seeking the truth is also an implicit and explicit goal of criminal courts which serve a primarily retributive function.

Rights Information

Terms of use for work posted in Scholar Commons.

Was this content written or created while at USF?

No

Citation / Publisher Attribution

Notre Dame Human Rights Advocate, no. 6, p. 4-5.

Scholar Commons Citation

May, Rachel A., "Truth and ‘Truth’: The Social Construction of Truth and Memory in International Human Rights" (2003). Latin America and the Caribbean Studies Faculty Publications. 3.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/las_facpub/3