Conflict and Trade: The Relationship between Geographic Distance and International Interactions
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2004
Keywords
Geographic distance, Trade, Conflict, Cooperation, International interactions
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.04.004
Abstract
This paper extends the conflict–trade model to incorporate geographic distance. It expands prior research on contiguity in two ways. First, unlike other studies, it examines how geographic distance between countries affects cooperation as well as conflict. Second, it incorporates distance’s indirect effect on bilateral trade, which in turn affects conflict. The results show that distance reduces both cooperation and conflict between countries. However, cooperation is decreased more than conflict so that net conflict (conflict minus cooperation) rises as geographic distance between two countries increases. But in addition, distance simultaneously increases transportation and other trading costs, thereby leading to increased conflict and decreased cooperation working through diminished trade. As such, contiguity enhances conflict when contiguous states exhibit little trade. Distance’s direct impact on net conflict is miniscule compared to its impact through trade.
Was this content written or created while at USF?
No
Citation / Publisher Attribution
The Journal of Socio-Economics, v. 33, issue 4, p. 491-509
Scholar Commons Citation
Chang, Yuan C.; Polachek, Solomon W.; and Robst, John, "Conflict and Trade: The Relationship between Geographic Distance and International Interactions" (2004). Mental Health Law & Policy Faculty Publications. 283.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/mhlp_facpub/283
