Reliability of Risk Assessment Measures Used in Sexually Violent Predator Proceedings
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2012
Keywords
risk assessment, interrater reliability, sexually violent predator
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
http://doi.org/10.1037/a0028411
Abstract
The field interrater reliability of three assessment tools frequently used by mental health professionals when evaluating sex offenders’ risk for reoffending—the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R), the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool–Revised (MnSOST-R) and the Static-99—was examined within the context of sexually violent predator program proceedings. Rater agreement was highest for the Static-99 (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC1] .78) and lowest for the PCL-R (ICC1 .60; MnSOST-R ICC1 .74), although all instruments demonstrated lower field reliability than that reported in their test manuals. Findings raise concerns about the reliability of risk assessment tools that are used to inform judgments of risk in high-stake sexually violent predator proceedings. Implications for future research and suggestions for improving evaluator training to increase accuracy when informing legal decision making are discussed.
Was this content written or created while at USF?
Yes
Citation / Publisher Attribution
Psychological Assessment, v. 24, issue 4, p. 944-953
Scholar Commons Citation
Miller, Cailey S.; Otto, Randy; Kimonis, Eva R.; and Wasserman, Adam L., "Reliability of Risk Assessment Measures Used in Sexually Violent Predator Proceedings" (2012). Mental Health Law & Policy Faculty Publications. 100.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/mhlp_facpub/100
