Event Title

Testing like William the Conqueror

Start Date

23-6-2013 10:00 AM

End Date

23-6-2013 11:30 AM

Keywords

school accountability, history, culture

Description

The spread of academic testing for accountability purposes in multiple countries has obscured at least two historical purposes of academic testing: community ritual and management of the social structure. Testing for accountability is very different from the purpose of academic challenges one can identify in community “examinations” in 19th century North America, or exams' controlling access to the civil service in Imperial China. Rather than testing for ritual or access to mobility, the modern uses of testing are much closer to the state‐building project of a tax census, such as the Domesday Book, the social engineering projects described in James Scott's Seeing like a State (1998) or the “mapping the world” project that David Nye described in America as Second Creation (2004). This paper will explore both the instrumental and cultural differences among testing as ritual, testing as mobility control, and testing as state‐building.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jun 23rd, 10:00 AM Jun 23rd, 11:30 AM

Testing like William the Conqueror

The spread of academic testing for accountability purposes in multiple countries has obscured at least two historical purposes of academic testing: community ritual and management of the social structure. Testing for accountability is very different from the purpose of academic challenges one can identify in community “examinations” in 19th century North America, or exams' controlling access to the civil service in Imperial China. Rather than testing for ritual or access to mobility, the modern uses of testing are much closer to the state‐building project of a tax census, such as the Domesday Book, the social engineering projects described in James Scott's Seeing like a State (1998) or the “mapping the world” project that David Nye described in America as Second Creation (2004). This paper will explore both the instrumental and cultural differences among testing as ritual, testing as mobility control, and testing as state‐building.